Charles Canham
Gravel, D., Charles D. Canham, M. Beaudet, and C. Messier. 2010. “Shade Tolerance, Canopy Gaps and Mechanisms of Coexistence of Forest Trees”. Oikos 119: 475-84.
Martin, P. H., Charles D. Canham, and Richard K. Kobe. 2010. “Divergence from the Growth-Survival Trade-off and Extreme High Growth Rates Drive Patterns of Exotic Tree Invasions in Closed-Canopy Forests”. J. Ecol. 98: 778-89.
Bigelow, S. W., and Charles D. Canham. 2010. “Evidence That Soil Aluminum Enforces Site Fidelity of Southern New England Forest Trees”. Rhodora 112: 1-21.
Canham, Charles D., and R.Q. Thomas. 2010. “Frequency, Not Relative Abundance, of Temperate Tree Species Varies Along Climate Gradients in Eastern North America”. Ecology 91: 3433-40.
Martin, P. H., and Charles D. Canham. 2010. “Dispersal and Recruitment Limitation in Native Versus Exotic Tree Species: Life-History Strategies and Janzen-Connell Effects”. Oikos 119: 807-24. http://www.caryinstitute.org/reprints/Martin_2010_Oikos.pdf.
Canham, Charles D. 2009. “Adirondack Upland Forests”. In W. F. Porter, R. S. Whaley, and J. D. Erickson (eds.). The Great Experiment in Conservation: Voices from the Adirondack Park. Syracuse University Press.
Kunstler, Georges, David A. Coomes, and Charles D. Canham. 2009. “Size-Dependence of Growth and Mortality Influence the Shade Tolerance of Trees in a Lowland Temperate Rain Forest”. J. Ecol. 97: 685-95.
Martin, P. H., Charles D. Canham, and P.L. Marks. 2009. “Why Forests Appear Resistant to Exotic Plant Invasions: Intentional Introductions, Stand Dynamics, and the Role of Shade Tolerance”. Front. Ecol. Environ. 7: 142-49. http://www.caryinstitute.org/reprints/Martin_2008_Frontiers.pdf.
Busby, P.E., Charles D. Canham, G. Motzkin, and D. R. Foster. 2009. “Forest Response to Chronic Hurricane Disturbance in Coastal New England”. J. Veg. Sci. 20: 487-97. doi:10.1111/j.1654-1103.2009.01056.x.
Coomes, David A., Charles D. Canham, Elaine F. Wright, and Georges Kunstler. 2009. “A Greater Range of Shade-Tolerance Niches in Nutrient-Rich Forests: An Explanation for Positive Richness-Productivity Relationships?”. J. Ecol. 97: 705-17.